Another nerd idea, please ignore.
I noticed that i can get some very good (or very bad) ratio against some players within my rating range. Or an unlikely 50% win against some player 500 points above me and vice versa.
Instead of the 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 ... table down the game with the total, it'd be interesting to have also a 63% / 37% column and the theorical p% / (100-p)% .
The very glicko system is all about the winning probability you have. Let's say you are 100 point below an opponent, you should have a 40% /60% ratio but you are only 35% / 65 % so something is wrong with your opening, your style, your connection, or whatever ...
As said before, i'm not 20 yet, i don't shave and wear nerdy fat lens glasses. I'm probably not allowed to vote in most states so my my opinion doesn't count except for the high school poetry contest.
I noticed that i can get some very good (or very bad) ratio against some players within my rating range. Or an unlikely 50% win against some player 500 points above me and vice versa.
Instead of the 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 ... table down the game with the total, it'd be interesting to have also a 63% / 37% column and the theorical p% / (100-p)% .
The very glicko system is all about the winning probability you have. Let's say you are 100 point below an opponent, you should have a 40% /60% ratio but you are only 35% / 65 % so something is wrong with your opening, your style, your connection, or whatever ...
As said before, i'm not 20 yet, i don't shave and wear nerdy fat lens glasses. I'm probably not allowed to vote in most states so my my opinion doesn't count except for the high school poetry contest.